June 5, 2026

Coalition of Civil and Voting Rights Organizations Condemns New York Redistricting Changes that Roll Back Protections for Minority Voters

FOR IMMEDIATE RELASE

June 5, 2026
Contact:
Media@latinojustice.org

Media@naacpldf.org
LLEID@CLSJ.org

Coalition of Civil and Voting Rights Organizations Condemns New York Redistricting Changes that Roll Back Protections for Minority Voters

New York, NY – LatinoJustice PRLDEF, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, The Center for Law and Social Justice at Medgar Evers College, and the Legal Defense Fund, long-time civil rights organizations who are members of the New York Voting Rights Consortium issued the following statement in response of the New York State Senate and Assembly passage of bill S10637, a constitutional amendment that would significantly expand legislative control over redistricting and eliminate key protections against gerrymandering amongst other changes.

Statement by New York Voting Rights Consortium:

“Our coalition has grave concerns about the New York State Legislature passage of a redistricting reform bill. This proposed constitutional amendment would strip critical civil rights protections from voters of color and make other unnecessary and sweeping changes to New York’s redistricting framework, removing longstanding safeguards that ensure fair representation for all New Yorkers. At a time when attacks on voting rights and our multiracial democracy are accelerating across the country, New York should be strengthening protections against discrimination, not joining the U.S. Supreme Court in dismantling them.

“The proposal would replace the results test’, a legal standard in force since 2014, that asks if a new voting map unfairly limits opportunities for voters of color to elect candidates of their choice, regardless of the legislature’s intent. These changes would make it substantially more difficult for voters and communities to challenge maps that dilute the voting strength of Black, Latino, Asian American, Indigenous, and other historically marginalized communities. It is particularly troubling that these changes are being pushed by those who have traditionally supported protecting these communities.

“We are already seeing the disastrous results of the Supreme Court’s abandonment of voting rights for Black and other communities in Louisiana, Tennessee, Florida, and Alabama. New York must not follow suit on removing protections for voters of color, let alone lead the way. This proposal needlessly results in a dismantling of critical statewide protections for voters of color. Our organizations remain committed to working alongside impacted communities to mobilize against these efforts to allow gerrymandering fervor to drive our elections. We continue to support constitutional and legislative protections for all voters in New York and across our country. We will make every effort to oppose discriminatory districting schemes and, and to continue to support constitutional and legislative protections for all voters in New York and across our country.”

###

About LatinoJustice

For over five decades, LatinoJustice PRLDEF has used and challenged laws to create a more just and equitable society. We transform harmful systems, empower our communities, fight for racial justice, and grow the next generation of líderes. To learn more, visit www.LatinoJustice.org

About the Legal Defense Fund
Founded in 1940, the Legal Defense Fund (LDF) is the nation’s first civil rights legal organization. LDF has been completely separate from the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) since 1957, though it was founded under the leadership of Thurgood Marshall while he was at the NAACP. LDF’s Thurgood Marshall Institute (TMI) is a division of LDF that undertakes innovative research and houses LDF’s archive. In all media attributions, please refer to us as the Legal Defense Fund or LDF (do not include NAACP) and refer to the Institute as LDF’s Thurgood Marshall Institute or TMI.

About the Center for Law and Social Justice at Medgar Evers College
The Center for Law and Social Justice at Medgar Evers College envisions a civically educated and engaged electorate within marginalized communities that consistently builds political power to marshal the representation and resources necessary to thrive. For forty years, CLSJ has fought for justice by providing effective legal advocacy, conducting community education campaigns and by facilitating research and building organizing capacity on behalf of the disenfranchised.

About the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund (AALDEF)
AALDEF is a national civil rights organization founded in 1974 to protect and promote the rights of Asian Americans. AALDEF serves diverse Asian communities around the country in solidarity with each other, communities of color, and marginalized groups. Community lawyering is at the heart of AALDEF’s work, which combines litigation, advocacy, education, and organizing to secure human rights for all people.

April 30, 2026

Center for Law and Social Justice Condemns Supreme Court Decision in Louisiana v. Callais as Major Threat to Black Political Power and American Democracy

The Center for Law and Social Justice at Medgar Evers College (CLSJ) strongly condemns the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Louisiana v. Callais. This ruling represents one of the most dangerous attacks on voting rights in generations and it threatens to dismantle hard-fought protections for Black voters across the nation. (Supreme Court)

In a 6-3 decision issued on April 29, 2026, the Court struck down Louisiana’s second majority-Black congressional district and significantly weakened the legal protections that communities of color have relied upon for decades to challenge discriminatory voting maps. This decision dramatically weakens Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 by making it far more difficult to challenge racial vote dilution in court. 

“The Supreme Court has sent a devastating message that Black political representation is negotiable,” said Lurie Daniel Favors, Executive Director of the Center for Law and Social Justice at Medgar Evers College. “This ruling opens the door for states to manipulate district maps in ways that silence Black communities while hiding behind the language of partisan politics. That is not democracy; it is disenfranchisement dressed up in legal terminology. These are the sorts of legal opinions that proactively dismantle the legal framework that upholds integration. Similar to the Supreme Court’s ruling in the 1857 Dred Scott v. Sanford case, in which the Supreme Court declared that the Black community had no rights which the white community was bound to respect, the Callais decision takes direct aim at Black voters and declares anti-Black discrimination in redistricting to be legal.”

The Court’s ruling builds upon earlier decisions that weakened the Voting Rights Act, including Shelby County v. Holder, which removed key federal oversight protections for states with histories of racial discrimination in voting. Louisiana v. Callais could accelerate efforts nationwide to redraw districts in ways that dilute Black voting power and reduce the number of Black elected representatives. (State Court Report)

Why This Matters to Brooklyn Communities

While the case originated in Louisiana, the consequences extend far beyond the South. Lest we forget, the 1965 Voting Rights Act was also used for decades to protect voters from discrimination in the Bronx, Brooklyn and NYC. Political district lines determine who has power in Congress, state legislatures, city councils, school boards, and local government. When communities are divided or packed into manipulated districts, their ability to advocate for resources and responsive leadership is weakened.

For communities in Central Brooklyn and across New York, those impacts can affect:

  • Public school funding
  • Affordable housing protections
  • Healthcare access
  • Environmental justice initiatives
  • Public transportation investments
  • Economic development
  • Criminal justice reform
  • Community safety and accountability

“Voting rights are not abstract legal concepts,” said Executive Director Daniel Favors. “They shape whether communities receive investment or neglect, whether schools remain open or underfunded, whether hospitals survive, and whether elected officials are accountable to the people they serve. This decision is one of the most significant setbacks to building a multiracial democracy since the Jim Crow era. It will also allow lawmakers to weaken Black voting strength so long as discriminatory maps can also be justified for partisan purposes.”

Since the ruling, several states have already moved to redraw districts that could reduce Black political influence, alarming civil rights organizations nationwide. 

A Dangerous Moment in American Democracy

The Center for Law and Social Justice is urging community members not to disengage, but instead to deepen civic participation and local organizing efforts.

“History teaches us that voting rights have never been protected without organized community resistance,” said Daniel Favors. “Every generation has had to fight to defend democracy against those who seek to narrow it. This generation is no different.”

CLSJ Calls for Immediate Action

The Center is calling on federal, state, and local leaders to take urgent action, including:

  • Restoring and strengthening the Voting Rights Act by passing the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act in congress;
  • Expanding protections against racial and partisan gerrymandering;
  • Increasing public education around redistricting and voting rights;
  • Supporting independent redistricting commissions; and 
  • Investing in grassroots civic engagement and voter education efforts.

The Center for Law and Social Justice will continue working with community organizations, students, legal advocates, faith leaders, and residents to educate the public about the implications of the decision and mobilize around the protection of voting rights and democratic participation.

About the Center for Law and Social Justice

The Center for Law and Social Justice at Medgar Evers College is a community-based legal and policy advocacy center committed to advancing social justice, educational equity, voting rights, economic justice, and community empowerment throughout Central Brooklyn and beyond.

###

 

May 30, 2025

Don’t ‘mistake backlash for failure’: NYC’s George Floyd protests, 5 years later

Don’t ‘mistake backlash for failure’_ NYC’s George Floyd protests, 5 years later – Gothamist

 

By Arun Venugopal
Published May 28, 2025
62 comments

https://gothamist.com/news/dont-mistake-backlash-for-failure-nycs-george-floyd-protests-5-years-later

Jawanza James Williams was a 30-year-old racial justice organizer when protests broke out five years ago in New York City and worldwide after George Floyd was killed by police in Minneapolis.

Williams, a Black, queer man from Bed-Stuy, led an “occupation” of City Hall Park. He was one of hundreds of people of different racial backgrounds who for weeks ate, slept and forged alliances beneath the Manhattan sky while urging city leaders to slash at least $1 billion in NYPD funding. The encampment culminated in the NYPD making arrests and injuring several demonstrators hours before a budget vote in City Hall.

“It was very much a real space with real problems,” said Williams, now the director of movement building at Vocal-NY, which advocates for low-income New Yorkers. “ What made it beautiful was that people were committed to confronting those problems” with “love, care, and compassion.”

Williams was one of thousands of New Yorkers who took to the streets to protest racial inequities five years ago, with a mixture of anger and idealism. Although the nation’s “racial reckoning” has since given way to a backlash nudged along by President Donald Trump, locally the scenario is more complicated, according to activists, academics and legal scholars who point to clear setbacks, relative gains and ways in which their demands for racial justice are still playing out in the halls of power.

Darrick Hamilton, the founding director of the New School’s Institute on Race, Power and Political Economy and a member of the New York City Racial Justice Commission, said that while “the politics of division” have defined the national landscape, elected officials and activists in New York have managed to translate the energy of the protests into tangible “infrastructure” with which to enact potentially lasting change.

This includes the city’s Racial Equity Plan and the Mayor’s Office of Equity and Racial Justice, which were created with overwhelming voter support in 2022 and are designed to reduce racial disparities in areas like health, policing and education. The charter change compels city government to acknowledge and regularly confront inequity in each of those areas, no matter how the prevailing political winds shift.

“Now, are we ready to spike the football? No,” Hamilton said. “But we have something by which to hold our municipality accountable and to build upon.”

Locally, racial justice activists helped establish a state reparations commission, tasked with studying the lingering effects of slavery and the possible payment of reparations. Monuments to former United States presidents that critics said glorified white supremacy were removed from their Manhattan locations. The city’s police oversight group was given additional resources.

Attempts to mitigate racial inequality in New York City since the protests have taken place even as public support for such measures has faded nationwide. In September 2020, 52% of Americans felt that increased attention to issues of racial inequality would lead to positive changes for Black people, according to the Pew Research Center. “That figure,” the Center said in a report earlier this month, “stands at just 27% today.”

Indeed, a number of equity issues elevated by Floyd’s murder and “Black Lives Matter” protests have been eclipsed by different politics and policies on the national stage. Coinciding with the fifth anniversary of Floyd’s murder, Trump earlier this month announced the end of consent decrees with local police departments — including in New York — to monitor law enforcement conduct.

The policy announcement is part of what Trump has called a “war on woke.” Through a flurry of executive orders, his administration has sought to undo diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives as well as other gains of the movement inspired by the deaths of Floyd, Michael Brown in one order Ferguson, Missouri, in 2014, and other African Americans at the hands of police. In issued in January, Trump sought to “end radical indoctrination in K-12 schooling.”

“In many ways we are fundamentally worse off now than we were five years ago,” said Lurie Daniel Favors, executive director of Medgar Evers College’s Center for Law and Social Justice and host of “The Lurie Daniel Favors Show” on SiriusXM.

The dark fog of the pandemic.

It can be easy to forget that the protests emerged during the pandemic, when public fears were ratcheted high by the lockdown, job losses and the very real fear of death from the COVID-19 virus. The police shooting deaths of Ahmaud Arbery and Breonna Taylor, in Georgia and Kentucky, respectively, in the first months of 2020 helped stoke anger among Black New Yorkers as the pandemic hit that community especially hard, with Black New Yorkers dying at twice the rate as their white counterparts.

Then came the police killing of Floyd, under the knee of a white officer, Derek Chauvin. Video of his killing went viral, and within hours, people were protesting in Minneapolis. Within days, the protests spread to every state in the nation, and eventually to 60 countries.

“I’ve been organizing for decades, and we’ve seen uprisings before, but never like this,” said Shanelle Matthews, who served as the communications director for the national Movement for Black Lives and is a distinguished lecturer in anthropology and interdisciplinary studies at City College of New York.

The protests’ impact was felt at the highest echelons of industry and politics. Leading Democrats wore kente cloth at the U.S. Capitol and observed a moment of silence for Floyd. JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon dropped to one knee at a branch in Westchester and told employees, “we are committed to fighting against racism and discrimination wherever and however it exists.”

Some of the most evident signs of the movement’s success related to historical symbolism and corporate hiring practices.

In the year after the Black Lives Matter protests, companies listed on the S&P 100 added more than 300,000 jobs – of which 94% went to people of color, according to a 2023 analysis by Bloomberg News. The number of Black workers filling “high-paying job categories” increased at 39 of those companies, including Microsoft, Pepsi, Meta and Lowe’s.

A statue of Thomas Jefferson, a president who owned hundreds of enslaved people, was removed from City Hall in New York City after 178 years, and a bronze statue of Theodore Roosevelt that had stood outside the American Museum of Natural History on the Upper West Side since 1940 was moved away because, then-Mayor Bill de Blasio said, “it explicitly depicts Black and Indigenous people as subjugated and racially inferior.”

In New York, de Blasio and the City Council agreed to shift $1  million away from the NYPD budget– although critics such as Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez say much of this was achieved through accounting tricks – and strengthen the Civilian Complaint Review Board. In 2022 voters overwhelmingly approved ballot proposals that changed the City Charter, requiring city officials to prioritize racial equity in areas such as policing, health and education. Some of the findings tied to the new obligations have been made public, though the effort has been marked by delays.

But public support for the movement soon waned, particularly in regard to policing and the “defund” objective. By the summer 2021, 47% of Americans said they favored increased police spending amid a nationwide rise in crime, according to the Pew Research Center, up from 31% in June 2020.

The shifting attitudes can also be seen in local politics. In 2021, New Yorkers elected a former police captain, Eric Adams, as the city’s 110th mayor. In 2025, leading mayoral candidate Andrew Cuomo is calling for the hiring of 5,000 new NYPD officers.

Hamilton, who served on the New York City Racial Justice Commission, said that although voters backed the creation of “infrastructure” designed to achieve racial equity citywide, its implementation was contingent on whether New Yorkers maintained pressure on public officials
or allowed the issue to fade from public discussion. “The answer to these questions,” Hamilton said, “depends on us.”

Making sense of shifting sentiments

Favors said the movement’s spectacular growth and rapid unraveling could be explained by a theory known as the interest convergence principle. The idea was coined by the late legal scholar Derrick Bell, and, according to Favors, suggests that “ White Americans have been willing to support the expansion of rights for Black people if the expansion of those rights was also going to work to the benefit of white people.”

But some activists said the movement’s waning demanded introspection and a reassessment of what strategies worked and what fell short.

Rashad Robinson, a New York-based writer and consultant who formerly led the national civil rights group Color of Change, said calls to “defund the police” spurred an important  conversation regarding the use of tax revenues. But he said the movement failed to convert momentum into lasting change.

“ In some ways a lot of the people who said they were repelled by notions of ‘defund’ wanted an easy out from a larger story of where we put our money in our society and how we spend it,” Robinson said.

“But at the end of the day, when our messages and narratives give them that easy out, we have to interrogate it,” he said. “So the question is not simply what we don’t fund, but what we do fund” whether that’s public education, parks or mental health services.

Matthews said protest groups were simply overwhelmed by the surge of interest, and “weren’t prepared to transform urban rebellions into sustained mass movements.”

“Our organizational infrastructure simply wasn’t equipped to absorb the influx of new people,” Matthews said. “It was a missed opportunity — and one we’re still reckoning with.”

Brooklyn College professor Jeanne Theoharis said her bigger disappointment is with the media,  who she said “swarmed around the uprisings” but failed to adequately monitor institutions that had pledged to improve conditions for Black Americans.

“I think there’s going to be a lot of like, ‘What went wrong with the movement?’ and not a lot of media organizations having to grapple with their own complicity in what didn’t get done right,” Theoharis said.

Mistaking ‘backlash for failure’

For all the regrets about how the movement played out, Matthews said there was plenty to take pride in, including how people talk about racial justice and inequality.

“We changed the story,” Matthews said. “And in power-building, that’s half the battle.”

Robinson said the movement has struggled to achieve substantive change in certain arenas, including “how corporations act and who they hurt in terms of the rules that prevent discrimination.”

But he said one area that had witnessed genuine success was criminal justice reform, specifically the decline in the prison population across many states,
including New York, where dozens of state prisons have closed and where the inmate population has fallen to less than half of the levels seen in the late 1990s.

“It doesn’t mean that we’ve ended mass incarceration,” he said. “ What it means is that we’ve built new leverage, we’ve built new narrative, we have more people in motion, we have more political leaders asking the right questions and doing the right thing even when we’re not in the room.”

Theoharis said the Trump administration’s efforts to undermine and erase evidence of Black history, including by dismantling DEI initiatives and stripping identity-linked references from government websites, “is precisely because of the success” of the movement, which shone a light on structural racism and historic racial inequities.

The efforts, she said, began with Trayvon Martin’s fatal shooting by George Zimmerman in Florida in 2012, followed by the police shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson two years later, “effectively holding up a mirror” to American history in a way that eventually invited a backlash.

“I mean, it’s a relentless campaign around history,” said Theoharis, author of a new book, “King of the North: Martin Luther King Jr.’s Life of Struggle Outside the South.”

However, Matthews said it would be wrong to “mistake backlash for failure.”

“The intensity of the response we saw — media campaigns, political scapegoating, even federal charges against organizers — proves our demands were effective. Empire doesn’t attack what isn’t working.”

Looking into the future

Five years later, Williams of Vocal-NY holds onto memories of the encampment he helped organize outside City Hall. He remembers how hundreds of demonstrators sat and watched nighttime city budget proceedings via a projector, or how his fellow occupiers would do the laundry of people they’d just met, “clean their clothes, fold them and bring them back.”

“ I’m in a bit of a loss for words to really express, what happened there?” he said.

Since then, Williams said, he has reflected on what 2020 achieved, and where it fell short.

Williams said while the movement had proven its ability to mobilize the masses, it had yet to organize them into a sustained political force.

“If more people were involved in organization, perhaps the very next year, we wouldn’t have elected Eric Adams, a former police officer,” he said.

Favors, who called herself “ a pessimistic optimist who is very realist about the realities of our history in this country,” doesn’t expect a broad multifaith coalition to re-emerge any time soon. But she leaves open the possibility, noting that “ every day of the week there are protests taking place in some states and cities across the country.”

“ I think in some ways the wealthy have overplayed their hand in that they are creating such horrific economic conditions for everyone that it’s giving poor white people an opportunity to rethink,” she said.

The goal in the coming era, Williams said, was to not get people into the street but “into the rooms” and institutions where they can build lasting power.

“Because we’re going to need a different kind of force in this country to beat back this authoritarian turn,” Williams said. “But I believe in us. I believe we can do it. We’ve done it before and we have to do it now, because humanity is counting on us.”

Arun Venugopal
April 28, 2025

The Divine Nine: Origins and History of Black Greek Fraternities and Sororities

New York Almanack: The Center for Brooklyn History and the Center for Law and Social Justice will have a special event at the Brooklyn Public Library on May 5, showcasing newly archived materials from Alpha Phi Alpha’s Gamma Iota Lambda Chapter and exploring the historic impact of Black Greek life on civil rights and public service. https://www.newyorkalmanack.com/2025/04/divine-nine-origins-history/

February 29, 2024

New York officially creates state body to study reparations

New York officially creates state body to study reparations – City & State New York

The State’s Commission to Study Reparations And Racial Justice will deliver a report with its findings to the governor and state Legislature next year.

By AUSTIN C. JEFFERSON | FEBRUARY 29, 2024

New York has officially formed the State’s Commission to Study Reparations And Racial Justice on Thursday, just a few months after Gov. Kathy Hochul signed the legislation that called for its creation. On Thursday, the governor, Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins and Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie announced their picks for the nine-member panel, with each official picking three members. Once the commission convenes its first meeting, it will have one year to deliver its findings and recommendations to the Hochul and the state Legislature.

Hochul appointed Jennifer Jones Austin, the CEO and executive director of the Federation of Protestant Welfare Agencies;
Timothy Hogues, the state Department of Civil Services Commissioner and president of the state Civil Service
Commission; and Linda Brown-Robinson, the New York State NAACP Western Region Director.

Stewart-Cousins selected Darrick Hamilton, the director of the Institute on Race, Power and Political Economy at The
New School; Linda Tarrant-Reid, executive director of the Lincoln Park Conservancy, which runs a food insecurity
program in Westchester County; and Seanelle Hawkins, the president and CEO of the Urban League of Rochester.
Heastie chose Ron Daniels, the founder and president of the Institute of the Black World 21st Century; Lurie Daniel
Favors, the executive director at the Center for Law and Social Justice at Medgar Evers College; and Deborah Jenkins,
founding pastor of the Faith at Work Christian Church in Co-op City.

Debates in New York over the feasibility and need for reparations raged for years before the legislation creating the
commission passed last June and was signed into law in December. Now that the commission’s work is speeding towards a
start, some are already celebrating.

“The Reparations Commission is the first step towards forging a path that acknowledges America’s original sin and
addresses centuries of discrimination, redlining, and institutionalized oppression. I am incredibly proud as a Black man
and a New Yorker that we are taking this step in the right direction to foster racial healing, and I look forward to
continuing to fight for these policies at the federal level,” Rep. Jamaal Bowman said in a statement.

Last year, Lisa Holder, a member of California’s reparations task force, told City & State that compensation, restitution,
apologies or atonement and guarantees of non-repetition and rehabilitation should be components of reparations. New
York lawmakers have similar hopes.

“This commission has a unique mission, and all appointees possess areas of expertise that will contribute to the
overarching goal of restitution and rehabilitation – core tenets of reparations,” Solages said in a statement.

February 2, 2024

‘How Many Stops Act’ Will Expose Police Abuse And Discrimination

By Lurie Daniel Favors, Esq.

BKReader | Feb 1, 2024

(Online Version: ‘How Many Stops Act’ Will Expose Police Abuse And Discrimination, BKReader)

The City Council’s decision to override the mayor not only upholds the democratic process, but also amplifies the voices of our communities in demanding accountability and racial equity in law enforcement.

Police Officers in Brooklyn

In December 2023, the Center for Law and Social Justice at Medgar Evers College was pleased to join in coalition with multiple justice-oriented groups to support the passage of the How Many Stops Act. This legislation contains two common-sense, good government bills requiring the NYPD to publicly report on all street public stops and consent searches. Together, these bills provide a powerful way to expose abusive and discriminatory policing practices.

On December 20, 2023, the New York City Council passed the How Many Stops Act with a decisive, veto-proof majority vote. However, instead of moving toward a more racially just city, on January 19, 2024, Mayor Eric Adams betrayed the voices of constituents in NYC’s Black, Latino, and other communities of color when he vetoed Intro. 586, one of the two HMSA bills, claiming it would overwhelm police with “paperwork.”

Like several others stemming from the Adams administration, that claim is false. The mayor has, unfortunately, shown a propensity for exaggeration, only to walk back or evade those same exaggerated claims when confronted with the truth. It happened when Mayor Adams said the migrant crisis would “destroy New York City.” Mayor Adams habitually spoke out against bail reform using hyperbolic language that shamefully conflated multiple unrelated issues to undermine the work of community organizers seeking to insert more justice in the criminal legal system. In May 2022, the New York Times noted that Mayor Adams claimed he “never witnessed crime at this level” even though crime was down. The Times noted that his claim did not stand up to scrutiny as there were 488 murders in the city during the previous year, “compared with 2,262 in 1990 when he was a transit police officer.”

The NYPD has been under federal monitoring for a decade because of its unconstitutional application of stop-and-frisk practices. Despite that reality, unconstitutional stop and frisks are back to levels not seen since 2015. Additionally, from 2022 to 2023, misconduct complaints against the NYPD increased by 51% and fatal shootings by the NYPD are the highest they’ve been in a decade. According to a recent report issued by a federal monitor, at least 24% of stops made by Neighborhood Safety Teams were unconstitutional, and 97% were of Black and Latinx New Yorkers. It’s no better in NYCHA, where one-third of stops are unconstitutional, and 70% of them are of Black people. Unfortunately, these statistics do not tell the full story. We know the numbers are worse in reality because the NYPD has no requirement to report on the vast majority of officers’ stops.

Officers can complete the reporting that the HMSA legislation requires in a matter of seconds. They can report these stops through a few drop-down menus on their Department-issued smartphones. In fact, their patrol guide already requires officers to record this sort of demographic information on Level 2 stops. The HMSA legislation codifies that rule into law, requires that the information is reported publicly, and extends it to Level 1 encounters.

With this simple reporting, HMSA will help address the NYPD’s chronic underreporting of stops, ensure stops are only made with the proper legal justification, and enable advocates and policy-makers to advance evidenced-based public safety measures.

We applaud the New York City Council’s decisive action to override the mayor’s veto, which marks a historic step towards transparency and justice in our policing system. This victory not only upholds the democratic process but also amplifies the voices of our communities in demanding accountability and racial equity in law enforcement.”

Lurie Daniel-Favors, Esq., is the executive director, Center for Law and Social Justice at Medgar Evers College.

 

September 19, 2023

Op-Ed | Life up New Yorkers in need – no matter when they arrived here

By Jumaane D. Williams, Lurie Daniels Favors, L. Joy Williams and Tamika Mallory

amNewYork| Sept 18, 2023 

(Online Version: Op-ed | Life up New Yorkers in need – no matter when they arrived here)

Crises create inflection points in our city – and we can choose the path forward. If we successfully meet the moments, there is an opportunity to address not only the immediate need, but the conditions that brought us to that point. In moments of heightened stakes, heightened emotions, and heightened need, however, there is great risk of doing additional, lasting harm.

That risk comes not from the arrival of people seeking refuge, a story that has come to define our city for many generations and across many nations and migration waves. Rather, it comes from the compounding of our leaders’ actions which have stoked division and inaction which has led to overburdened, failing systems – not only across the last year and a half, but across decades.

When the mayor said the migrant crisis would “destroy New York City,” and that we had “never” faced a crisis with no clear end, many rightly condemned his rhetoric as inflammatory, dangerous, and untrue. Whether he intended those words to be harmful, they created conditions where slashing essential services will be attributed entirely to people seeking asylum. This will continue to ignite animosity between longtime residents and our newest New Yorkers, and we fear that words and actions combined could threaten the safety of people who have already faced enormous danger.

The comments, the cuts, and the crisis are all meeting a context of longstanding neglect and disinvestment in longtime New Yorkers – largely from Black, Brown, and working-class communities across our city. People who have seen their neighborhoods and livelihoods suffer from a lack of government investment or attention now see news every day about new arrivals and requests for new resources. When you have long been denied access to truly affordable, accessible housing, it is hard to see newly funded shelters open each week. When your child’s school is already under-resourced, it is hard to see a wave of new students enrolled. When you struggle to put food on the table, it is hard to see the government provide supplies to our newest arrivals.

We understand the frustrations of longtime New Yorkers who have never seen the focus or funding that they deserve in their communities. And we don’t ask them to forget their frustrations – only to aim them at who is truly to blame for decades of dysfunction – a government which only responds to acute crises, rather than addressing longstanding harms that make those crises worse.

Both the people seeking asylum and longtime New Yorkers seeking services that could be cut echo the same message. “We are hurting, we’ve been hurting for a long time. Please do not take actions that will only hurt us more. “

When the administration turns to cuts, and announces that scarcity is due to the expense of our new New Yorkers, at the expense of longtime residents, that only increases the anger, because it only increases the hurt.

A failure of urgency or imagination to combat past crises has helped create the conditions we face today. Instead of supporting raising revenue from the people with more, these cuts will take from the people with less, while blaming the arrival of people with the least.

Beyond the rhetoric is a reality that our city does need to account for the funding of shelter and services for people here seeking asylum – a multi-billion dollar expense. We can do that either by reducing spending in some areas or by finally getting the resources we require from the state and federal government – the governor has recently started to step up, but refuses to acknowledge the statewide right to shelter, and the White House is still almost entirely absent. Washington can provide the relief New York needs and the support migrants deserve, but right now we must operate as if that aid will never come.

We have been placed in an extremely difficult situation through the actions of Republican governors and the inaction of a Democratic president. New York City did not create these circumstances – but how we respond to them matters. The city has made missteps and mistakes, but these cuts would be among the most direct and dire.

While we must be fiscally responsible, we must also be morally responsible. That means continuing to do all we can to meet the needs of people arriving in our city, and it means refusing to ignite or engage in an “us vs. them” positioning which pits communities against one another.

Reducing the resources for the government, reducing the services the government provides, and casting blame on an out-group is not a new strategy, but it is one that thousands of people have come here not to expect, but to escape.

Our city has navigated many acute crises before – a recession, a pandemic, a terror attack – and while we may not have known how those crises would resolve, at our best moments we resolved to do all we could, with all we had – to lead with clarity and compassion in equal measure. That standard needs to be applied to the migrant crisis, but also to the longstanding crises that do not dominate the headlines, but define the lives and livelihoods of so many.

The only way this latest crisis could “destroy” New York City is if we let the challenge of the situation interfere with our spirit, our solidarity, and our commitment to lift up New Yorkers in need, no matter how or when they arrived.

Jumaane D. Williams – New York City Public Advocate; Lurie Daniels Favors,  Esq. – Executive Director of the Center for Law & Social Justice at Medgar Evers College; L. Joy Williams – President of the Brooklyn NAACP; and Tamika Mallory, Co-Founder of Until Freedom 

 

June 28, 2023

CLSJ Gala Journal

Click here to access the CLSJ Gala Journal!

January 17, 2023

Commentary: On voting protections, New York has more work to do

By Lurie Daniel Favors, Esq. and Joanna Zdanys, Esq.

Times Union Op Ed | Jan 16, 2023 

Online Link: Commentary: On voting protections, New York has more work to do

Across the country last year, election denialism, megadonor spending, and new restrictive voting laws showed the urgent need to shore up our democracy. In New York, our lawmakers addressed these problems head on by enacting a first-in-the-nation state voting rights act and launching the most robust public campaign financing program in the country.  And just last week, the state Senate’s first order of business in the new session was passing key voting rights and board of election reforms.

But we can’t take these achievements for granted. While these reforms hold great promise, they need careful implementation and resources to succeed. As the new legislative session starts up, our leaders in Albany must keep strengthening New York’s democracy.

That’s why a coalition of 101 organizations — including the Center for Law and Social Justice at Medgar Evers College, the Brennan Center for Justice, and a range of labor, racial justice and voting rights groups — have urged our state’s leaders to continue their commitment to our state’s democracy this session.

That commitment starts with building on the promise of the new John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York. The new law makes our state a national leader in fighting race-based voter suppression. This year, lawmakers must enact companion legislation creating a public statewide voting and elections database, which the Senate passed last week. This resource will foster data-driven decision-making and promote more equitable voting access statewide. The budget must include funding to support these reforms.

Lawmakers must also provide resources to implement the state’s new voter registration deadline of ten days before Election Day. The new deadline will enable one “golden day” of same-day registration on the first day of early voting. Nearly half of U.S. states already allow voters to register at the polls. Same-day registration would increase New Yorkers’ opportunity to vote and help improve the state’s persistently low voter turnout rates.

To secure these gains, our leaders must also enact the board of elections reform package, the bulk of which the Senate now has passed twice. Our state’s elections agencies operate without adequate oversight, lack basic hiring standards, and suffer chronic underfunding. These problems contribute to persistent administrative failures that undermine public faith in elections. This package would enact common-sense, national best practices to strengthen leadership, training, and accountability at our local boards. Along with these reforms, lawmakers must provide dedicated funding for local election administration.

Our leaders must also fully fund the implementation of small-donor public financing. This voluntary new program is the nation’s most powerful counter to unfettered wealth in our elections. The upcoming budget must include the $114.5 million that the Public Campaign Finance Board has requested to run the program. It’s a modest but meaningful investment in a democracy that works better for all New Yorkers.

The budget must also include sufficient resources to implement automatic voter registration, which goes into effect this month. If properly implemented, it could add as many as 1.1 million eligible New Yorkers to the voter rolls, helping diminish a significant barrier to the franchise.

In just a few years New York has become a national champion of democracy and secured real gains for the state’s voters, but there’s much more to be done. Gov. Kathy Hochul and state lawmakers must recommit to building a stronger, fairer, and more inclusive democracy for all.

Lurie Daniel Favors is executive director of the Center for Law and Social Justice at Medgar Evers College. Joanna Zdanys is counsel in the Elections and Government Program at the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law.

Written By

Lurie Daniel Favors and Joanna Zhanys

December 24, 2022

CLSJ Urges NY Senate to Reject Nomination of Justice Hector LaSalle for Chief Judge Of New York

 

NEW YORK, NY – Gov. Kathy Hochul recently announced her nomination of Justice Hector LaSalle as New York’s next Chief Judge. In response, Lurie Daniel-Favors, Esq Executive Director of the Center for Law and Social Justice at Medgar Evers College released this statement:

Press Release CLSJ Urges Senate to Reject Nomination of Justice Hector LaSalle for Chief Judge Of New York 12-24-22

March 25, 2022

New York Voting Rights Consortium Endorses the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act

page1image26129408 page1image26130448 page1image26117136 page1image26122960

646-549-1130 / idawson@clsj.org

Today, the New York Voting Rights Consortium, a non-partisan group of civil rights organizations, reiterated its support for the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA). The consortium, which includes the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF), the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, and the Center for Law and Social Justice (CLSJ) at Medgar Evers College, urges the New York State Legislature to pass the NYVRA as soon as possible, as its protections are more critical now than ever, both for New York and for the nation. Yesterday, February 21st, would have been Congressman Lewis’s 82nd birthday, and we encourage New York’s elected leaders to honor his legacy by safeguarding the “precious, almost sacred” right to vote.

As Congress struggles to pass federal legislation to enact a new preclearance mechanism, it is essential that policymakers in Albany re-create a preclearance system for jurisdictions in New York, where the risk of discrimination against voters of color remains high. By requiring those jurisdictions to obtain approval from the state attorney general’s office or a court before they change any voting procedures, the NYVRA will address this urgent threat to the rights of New York’s citizens. And it will position New York as a national leader in protecting the right to vote.

“This act is a critical piece of legislation that, for New York residents, will restore many of the former federal voter protections that were significantly weakened by the Supreme Court in Shelby County v. Holder,” said Sherrilyn Ifill, LDF’s President and Director-Counsel. “In particular, the reintroduction of preclearance will help ensure that voters of color in New York have equal access to the ballot box—and that they are safeguarded from voter suppression tactics. In the strongest terms, we urge state lawmakers to make this bill a top priority this session.”

“The New York State Voting Rights Act will protect New Yorkers of African descent and other people of color from voter discrimination fueled by increasingly restrictive and onerous laws that chip away at minority suffrage,” says Lurie Daniel Favors, Esq., Executive Director at the Center for Law and Social Justice at Medgar Evers College. “This critical legislation seeks to create a New York State version of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) and will restore many of the VRA protections that were gutted by the 2013 Supreme Court decision in Shelby vs. Holder. These protections will allow our communities to engage in American democracy more freely by casting ballots to determine its future at every level. For more than 30 years, CLSJ has fought to protect and advance voting rights for New Yorkers of African descent, and we are excited to see our state elected officials continue in this fight for justice.”

“Latinos in New York account for more than two million eligible voters statewide – the largest nonwhite voting bloc in the state. LatinoJustice PRLDEF strongly supports the New York State Voting Rights Act, which provides proactive protections to ensure that the fundamental right to vote is available to Latino and other minority voters. The bill provisions requiring assistance for language-minority voters in any electoral jurisdictions where more than two percent of citizens (or 4,000 registrants) of voting age are part of a single-language minority group will help ensure that Spanish-speaking New Yorkers are able to exercise their right to vote without facing insurmountable language barriers,” said Lourdes Rosado, President and General Counsel, LatinoJustice PRLDEF.

“Asian Americans have experienced incredible growth in New York state much like the rest of the country, yet our share of political power underwhelms our share of the population. This underrepresentation is a direct result of the historically discriminatory policies designed to suppress our vote and ability to fully engage in the democratic process. Despite the protections of the federal Voting Rights Act, Asian Americans and communities of color have had to turn to ‘good trouble’ to fight for our fair share. The John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York is vital to ensure New York’s halls of power truly reflect the will of its vibrant and diverse electorate,” said Jerry Vattamala, Director of the Democracy Program at Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund.

Certain jurisdictions in New York State have a long history of discriminating against voters of color through suppressive election laws and policies. These have included voter purges in which predominantly Latinx and Asian American people were removed from the state’s voter rolls, congressional redistricting plans that discriminated against communities of color by making it more difficult for them to elect their preferred candidates, and the frequent use of at-large elections, which often prevent voters of color from electing any candidates of choice if they constitute a minority of their jurisdiction’s population.

Section 5 of the federal Voting Rights Act (VRA) required some of those jurisdictions, along with all or part of 14 additional states, to submit any voting-related changes for preclearance to a federal court or the attorney general to determine whether they were discriminatory. This preclearance mechanism was considered the “heart” of the Voting Rights Act. In the devastating 2013 Shelby County v. Holder decision, the Supreme Court essentially immobilized Section 5.

In addition to restoring preclearance, the proposed law—sponsored in the Senate by Sen. Zellnor Myrie as S.1046A, and in the Assembly by Assemblymember Latrice Walker and others as A.6678A—strengthens other voter protections, making it easier to address instances of vote dilution and voter suppression, intimidation, or interference. It also enhances language-access protections and increases public access to data necessary for voting rights enforcement, election protection, and transparent policymaking by public officials.

The consortium strongly supports this legislation and any other efforts that remove burdens for New York residents—including the more than three million registered voters in New York who identify as Black, Latino, or Asian—to participate in the electoral process and exercise their constitutional rights.

###

About The Center For Law And Social Justice At Medgar Evers College
CLSJ’s mission is to address racial justice issues by providing quality legal advocacy, conducting community education campaigns, facilitating research and building organizing capacity on behalf of New Yorkers of African descent and the disenfranchised. To learn more about CLSJ visit www.CLSJ.org.

Follow CLSJ on Twitter, Instagram and Facebook.

About LDF

Founded in 1940, the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) is the nation’s first civil and human rights law organization. LDF has been completely separate from the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) since 1957—although LDF was originally founded by the NAACP and shares its commitment to equal rights. LDF’s Thurgood Marshall Institute is a multi-disciplinary and collaborative hub within LDF that launches targeted campaigns and undertakes innovative research to shape the civil rights narrative. In media attributions, please refer to us as the NAACP Legal Defense Fund or LDF. 

About LatinoJustice

LatinoJustice PRLDEF works to create a more just society by using and challenging the rule of law to secure transformative, equitable and accessible justice, by empowering our community and by fostering leadership through advocacy and education. For nearly 50 years, LatinoJustice PRLDEF has acted as an advocate against injustices throughout the country. To learn more about LatinoJustice, visit www.LatinoJustice.org

 About AALDEF

The Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund (AALDEF), a New York-based national organization founded in 1974, protects and promotes the civil rights of Asian Americans. By combining litigation, advocacy, education, and organizing, AALDEF works with Asian American communities across the country to secure human rights for all. AALDEF focuses on critical issues affecting Asian Americans, including immigrant rights, voting rights and democracy, economic justice for workers, educational equity, housing and environmental justice, and the elimination of anti-Asian violence.

Sign Up For Our Mailing List